All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00209775%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000005" target="_blank" >RIV/00209775:_____/19:N0000005 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14110/19:00110423

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479168/pdf/fmicb-10-00821.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479168/pdf/fmicb-10-00821.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00821" target="_blank" >10.3389/fmicb.2019.00821</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery

  • Original language description

    Our understanding of human gut microbiota in health and disease depends on accurate and reproducible microbial data acquisition. The critical step in this process is to apply an appropriate methodology to extract microbial DNA, since biases introduced during the DNA extraction process may result in inaccurate microbial representation. In this study, we attempted to find a DNA extraction protocol which could be effectively used to analyze both the bacterial and fungal community. We evaluated the effect of five DNA extraction methods (QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, PureLinkTM Microbiome DNA Purification Kit, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrepTM Kit, NucleoSpin® DNA Stool Kit, and IHMS protocol Q) on bacterial and fungal gut microbiome recovery using (i) a defined system of germ-free mice feces spiked with bacterial or fungal strains, and (ii) non-spiked human feces. In our experimental setup, we confirmed that the examined methods significantly differed in efficiency and quality, which affected the identified stool microbiome composition. In addition, our results indicated that fungal DNA extraction might be prone to be affected by reagent/kit contamination, and thus an appropriate blank control should be included in mycobiome research. Overall, standardized IHMS protocol Q, recommended by the International Human Microbiome Consortium, performed the best when considering all the parameters analyzed, and thus could be applied not only in bacterial, but also in fungal microbiome research.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10606 - Microbiology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Frontiers in microbiology

  • ISSN

    1664-302X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    April 2019

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    821

  • UT code for WoS article

    000464958900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85067103238