BATON-CRC: A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Tivozanib Plus mFOLFOX6 with Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Stage IV Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00209805%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000053" target="_blank" >RIV/00209805:_____/16:N0000053 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/07/09/1078-0432.CCR-15-3117" target="_blank" >http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/07/09/1078-0432.CCR-15-3117</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3117" target="_blank" >10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3117</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

BATON-CRC: A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Tivozanib Plus mFOLFOX6 with Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Stage IV Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Original language description

Purpose: Tivozanib, a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, plus mFOLFOX6 in an advanced gastrointestinal cancer phase Ib study had encouraging antineoplastic activity and a tolerable safety profile. This randomized, open-label, phase II trial of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) evaluated tivozanib activity versus bevacizumab. Experimental Design: Treatment-naïve patients received mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of each 28-day cycle plus either tivozanib orally 1.5 mg once daily for 21 days or bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Investigator-assessed PFS was the primary endpoint; some secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival, ORR, duration of response, time to treatment failure, and biomarker subgroup analyses. Results: A prespecified interim futility analysis demonstrated that the futility boundary for superiority of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 over bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 for PFS in the intent-to-treat population was crossed; median PFS was 9.4 versus 10.7 months [HR ¼ 1.091; confidence interval (CI), 0.693–1.718; P ¼ 0.706]. Tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 resulted in PFS and ORR comparable with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6; interim analyses biomarker results revealed no significant PFS association. Post hoc final analyses demonstrated a potential difference in tivozanib-specific PFS in patients with low neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), but not in patients with high NRP-1. Conclusions: The efficacy of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was comparable with but not superior to bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated mCRC. Since data from the prespecified interim analysis did not demonstrate superiority, this resulted in discontinuation of the study. The safety and tolerability profile of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was consistent with other tivozanib trials. NRP-1 is a potential predictive biomarker for tivozanib activity, but these results require further validation.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

FD - Oncology and haematology

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2016

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Clinical cancer research

ISSN

1078-0432

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

22

Issue of the periodical within the volume

20

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

10

Pages from-to

5058-5067

UT code for WoS article

000385632700014

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—