All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00209805%3A_____%2F21%3A00078636" target="_blank" >RIV/00209805:_____/21:00078636 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914021004896" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914021004896</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples

  • Original language description

    Proteomics of human tissues and isolated cellular subpopulations create new opportunities for therapy and monitoring of a patients&apos; treatment in the clinic. Important considerations in such analysis include recovery of adequate amounts of protein for analysis and reproducibility in sample collection. In this study we compared several protocols for proteomic sample preparation: i) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), ii) in-solution digestion (ISD) and iii) a pressure-assisted digestion (PCT) method. PCT method is known for already a decade [1], however it is not widely used in proteomic research. We assessed protocols for proteome profiling of isolated immune cell subsets and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Our results show that the ISD method has very good efficiency of protein and peptide identification from the whole proteome, while the FASP method is particularly effective in identification of membrane proteins. Pressure-assisted digestion methods generally provide lower numbers of protein/peptide identifications, but have gained in popularity due to their shorter digestion time making them considerably faster than for ISD or FASP. Furthermore, PCT does not result in substantial sample loss when applied to samples of 50 000 cells. Analysis of FFPE tissues shows comparable results. ISD method similarly yields the highest number of identifications. Furthermore, proteins isolated from FFPE samples show a significant reduction of cleavages at lysine sites due to chemical modifications with formaldehyde-such as methylation (+14 Da) being among the most common. The data we present will be helpful for making decisions about the robust preparation of clinical samples for biomarker discovery and studies on pathomechanisms of various diseases.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000868" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000868: Molecular, cellular and clinical approach to healthy ageing</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Talanta

  • ISSN

    0039-9140

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    233

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    october 2021

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    122568

  • UT code for WoS article

    000668000500083

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85108280622