All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Three Single Platform Methods for CD34+Hematopoietic Stem Cell Enumeration by Flow Cytometry

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F11%3A11293" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/11:11293 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00064165:_____/11:11293 RIV/00023736:_____/11:00009520

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord&UT=000298897400026" target="_blank" >http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord&UT=000298897400026</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Three Single Platform Methods for CD34+Hematopoietic Stem Cell Enumeration by Flow Cytometry

  • Original language description

    In the present study, we compared three single platform methods for CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) enumeration by flow cytometry. For this purpose, we analyzed the performance characteristics and results obtained from different HSC sources. Interlaboratory coefficients of variation (CV) for precision/reproducibility analysis varied from 4.0% to 6.7% / 6.7% to 9.2% for the low and 3.2% to 4.1% / 4.3% to 6.7%, respectively, for the high stem cell control. Correlation between methods ranged from 0.92%to 0.99%; Wilcoxon test showed no significant differences (p >0.05); Bland-Altman analysis confirmed good agreement between assays (mean bias ranging from -0.48 to 6.91). Our results demonstrate very good intralaboratory correlation and agreement between methods, confirm the major impact of single platform strategy for accurate and reproducible HSC enumeration and suggest that high interlaboratory variability could be influenced by incorrect performance of validated methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FD - Oncology and haematology

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2011

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Clinical Laboratory

  • ISSN

    1433-6510

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    57

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    1031-1035

  • UT code for WoS article

    000298897400026

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database