Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F11%3A9972" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/11:9972 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064165:_____/11:9972 RIV/00064211:_____/11:#0000155
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system
Original language description
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system's use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615-620, 2006). Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics. The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively. There is an almost perfect
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FK - Gynaecology and obstetrics
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)