Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10190450" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10190450 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11140/14:10190450 RIV/49777513:23520/14:43920348 RIV/00669806:_____/14:10190450 RIV/00064165:_____/14:10190450
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.ijgo.org/article/S0020-7292%2813%2900490-6/fulltext" target="_blank" >http://www.ijgo.org/article/S0020-7292%2813%2900490-6/fulltext</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy
Original language description
Objective: To evaluate the incidence and extent of vaginal and perineal trauma among primiparous women after mediolateral and lateral episiotomy. Methods: In a prospective randomized study at University Hospital Pilsen, Czech Republic, 790 consecutive primiparous women were enrolled between April 2010 and April 2012. Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) followed an angle of at least 60o fromthemidline. Lateral episiotomy(LE) started 1-2 cm laterally from the midline and was directed toward the ischial tuberosity. A rectal examination was performed before episiotomy repair. Results: MLE was performed for 390 women, and LE for 400. The groups did not differ in maternal or neonatal characteristics. No difference was found in incidence or extent of vaginal and perineal trauma; or in additional perineal (1.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.6) or vaginal (8.5% vs 10.6%, P = 0.2) trauma continuing along the episiotomy incision. The incidence of anal sphincter injury did not differ between MLE and LE (1.5% vs 1.3%,
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FK - Gynaecology and obstetrics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0090" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0090: NTIS - New Technologies for Information Society</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ISSN
0020-7292
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
124
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
72-76
UT code for WoS article
000330086100017
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—