Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F17%3A10359927" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/17:10359927 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11120/17:43913262 RIV/00216208:11130/17:10359927 RIV/00064173:_____/17:N0000048 RIV/00064203:_____/17:10359927
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4505-z" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4505-z</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4505-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00405-017-4505-z</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results
Original language description
Skull base tumors and, in particular, vestibular schwannoma (VS) are among the etiological reasons for single-sided deafness (SSD). Patients with SSD have problems in understanding speech in a noisy environment and cannot localize the direction of sounds. Baha is one of the most frequently used systems for SSD compensation. Out of 38 patients with SSD after retrosigmoid removal of VS who underwent testing with Baha softband, 16 were satisfied and were indicated for Baha implantation. Two surgical approaches have been used-the Nijmegen linear incision technique with subdermal thinning (Group I, implant BI300) and fast surgery technique without subdermal thinning (Group II, implant BIA400). The duration of the surgery, the implant stability measured by Ostell, and skin or soft tissue reactions in long range follow-up were evaluated and compared between Group I and II. There was a difference in duration of surgery, in Group II procedures averaged significantly faster (p > 0.001). In both groups, there was a similar trend of the gradual increase of implant stability. In the Group I and II, there was comparable rate of the skin or soft tissue reactions grade 0, I, II, or III. We have proved Baha to be a suitable possibility for SSD patients after the removal of VS, regardless of the approach. After the retrosigmoid approach to the VS, the key step of Baha implantation must be to reach intact healthy bone to avoid implantation into scar tissue.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30206 - Otorhinolaryngology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NT11543" target="_blank" >NT11543: BAHA processor in patients with single-sided deafness</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
ISSN
0937-4477
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
274
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
2429-2436
UT code for WoS article
000400754900009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85015206236