3D electroanatomical mapping is less sensitive to atrial remodeling in estimation of true left atrial volume than echocardiography
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F18%3A10381817" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/18:10381817 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064165:_____/18:10381817
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0276-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0276-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0276-2" target="_blank" >10.1186/s12880-018-0276-2</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
3D electroanatomical mapping is less sensitive to atrial remodeling in estimation of true left atrial volume than echocardiography
Original language description
Background: Left atrial (LA) enlargement has been identified as a predictor of worse clinical outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the correspondence of LA size parameters assessed by echocardiography, CT and 3D electroanatomical mapping in patients with AF treated by catheter ablation. Methods: We analyzed echocardiographic LA volume measurements by disc summation method (LAV(DISC)), computed tomography (LAV(CT)) and 3D electroanatomical mapping (LAV(CARTO)) in 100 pts. (71% males; aged 63 +/- 8 years; paroxysmal AF in 55% of patients). Results: Mean LAV(DISC) was 83 +/- 25 ml (median: 115; IQR: 98-140 ml), mean LAV(CT) was 120 +/- 34 ml (median: 115; IQR: 98-140 ml) and mean LAV(CARTO) was 123 +/- 36 ml (median: 118; IQR: 99-132 ml). Pearson's correlation coefficient between LAV(DISC) a LAV(CT) was 0.6 (p < 0.0001) and between LAV(CARTO) and LAV(CT) was 0.79 (p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.004). The absolute difference between LAV(CARTO) and LAV(CT) (3.5 (95% CI -42 - 43) ml) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) as compared to LAV(DISC) and LAV(CT) (-39 (95% CI -102 - 24) ml). In opposite to LAV(DISC), the bias between LAV obtained by CT and CARTO did not differentiate according to presence of spherical remodeling (1.7 +/- 28 vs. vs. 5.1 +/- 31 ml). Only presence of sinus rhythm was significant and independent covariate of the difference between CARTO and CT-derived LAVs by multivariate regression analysis. Conclusions: Even though LA volumes evaluated by 3D-electroanatomical mapping have quite good accuracy, the precision is low. For volumes estimated by echocardiography, both precision and accuracy are low.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BMC Medical Imaging
ISSN
1471-2342
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
18
Issue of the periodical within the volume
September
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000445126800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85053594691