All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The state of national electronic prescription systems in the EU in 2018 with special consideration given to interoperability issues

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10417101" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10417101 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21460/20:00341541 RIV/00064165:_____/20:10417101

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rktkYnrFHV" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rktkYnrFHV</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104205" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104205</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The state of national electronic prescription systems in the EU in 2018 with special consideration given to interoperability issues

  • Original language description

    Introduction: The electronic prescribing system (EPS) is now widely used in the USA and largely also in EU member countries. Nevertheless, comparisons of different EPS are very scarce. Whilst the EU strives for cross-border interoperability in healthcare, the aim of this study is to provide a contemporary account of the state of national EPS in such countries. Methods: For the sake of consistency the state of each of the EPS as of the end of 2018 was researched using an e-mail questionnaire. Respondents were chosen from among authors who have previously published studies on electronic prescriptions. Results: Data on EPS was gathered from 23 out of the 28 EU member states. In 2018 EPS was in daily use in 19 EU states, and one further country had a pilot project, whereas the remaining 3 were only at the planning stage. Most of the EPS do not differ significantly in basic design, however authentication procedures vary substantially. Discussion: There is a significant increase in EPS usage in EU countries as compared with previous studies. Cross-border interoperability in the EU is still limited, and further advancement might be hampered by differences in authentication procedures. Conclusion: Although it was not possible to acquire data from all the EU countries, this study shows the present state of electronic prescription in most of them and demonstrates continuous development in this area.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30502 - Other medical science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal of Medical Informatics

  • ISSN

    1386-5056

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    141

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    September

  • Country of publishing house

    IE - IRELAND

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    104205

  • UT code for WoS article

    000579780700030

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85085545690