Study design, size, and adequate exposure data as the crucial aspects in cancer risk assessment and implementation of the precautionary principle
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10417138" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10417138 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Whj.cxPLn_" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Whj.cxPLn_</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a6159" target="_blank" >10.21101/cejph.a6159</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Study design, size, and adequate exposure data as the crucial aspects in cancer risk assessment and implementation of the precautionary principle
Original language description
Traditional approaches and study design in cancer epidemiology have not been very successful in identifying and evaluating adequately the potential risk and/or protective factors associated with the disease. The main reasons for the failure are often due the small study sample size, and inadequate exposure information. In this paper, issues and approaches relevant to these two challenges are discussed. Multicentre study is proposed as a way to increase study size and to mitigate criticism about meta-analysis of independent studies. A multicentre study of large cohort or case-control studies also offer an exciting opportunity to study the contribution of epigenetic events that may be associated with lifestyle and environmental risk factors for human health. Optimizing methods for exposure assessment and how to reduce exposure to misclassification represent a difficult component in epidemiological studies. A potentially useful approach for improving exposure estimation is to rely on biomarkers of exposures. An example is provided to demonstrate how biomarkers of exposures could provide valuable information in addition to exposure measurements in traditional epidemiological studies. Finally, it is argued that risk assessment and the precautionary principle should not be viewed as conflicting paradigms but, rather, as a complementary approach for developing appropriate policies to address risks posed by exposure to carcinogens and a wide spectrum of other health hazards.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30304 - Public and environmental health
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central European Journal of Public Health
ISSN
1210-7778
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
28
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Suppl.
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
"S65"-"S68"
UT code for WoS article
000620659300013
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85093642309