Minimally invasive tubular versus conventional open microsurgery of the lumbar spine for degenerative disorders
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F24%3A10490980" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/24:10490980 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=PyjrBLyw.t" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=PyjrBLyw.t</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00927-4" target="_blank" >10.1186/s41983-024-00927-4</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Minimally invasive tubular versus conventional open microsurgery of the lumbar spine for degenerative disorders
Original language description
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate patient-related variables, hospital-related variables and surgeon-related variables of minimally invasive tubular microsurgery (MITM) compared to conventional open microsurgery (COMS) in patients undergoing microsurgery for lumbar degenerative disorders (LDD). Results: 403 included patients were treated microsurgically for LDD between 09/2018 and 09/2021. Mean blood loss (44 vs. 72 ml), surgery time (76.2 vs. 85.7 min) and mean Rx-Dosis (1.1 mGy vs. 1.6 mGy) were lower in the MITM group (all p < 0.05). The Macnab criteria and VAS pain scale (VAS Leg/VAS Back) of the MITM group were better at 6 weeks as well as 1 year postoperatively (Macnab at 6W: 1.5 vs. 1.7 (p = 0.02), at 1y: 1.2 vs. 1.4 (p = 0.002); VAS Leg at 6W: 1.4 vs. 1.9 (p = 0.005), at 1y: 0.4 vs. 0.9 (p < 0.001), VAS Back at 6W 1.4 vs. 3.2 (p < 0.001), at 1y: 1.2 vs. 1.4 (p < 0.001)). Conclusion: The patient-related variables, hospital-related variables and surgeon-related variables are equivalent or better in MITM compared to COMS. MITM showed more favourable clinical outcomes in both short- and long-term follow-up, albeit small between-group differences in our single-center study and can be considered for various microsurgical indications for LDD.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
ISSN
1110-1083
e-ISSN
1687-8329
Volume of the periodical
60
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
151
UT code for WoS article
001385831200002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85213253102