Defining and Categorizing Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Older Population: A Systematic Review
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F25%3A10505524" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/25:10505524 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11160/25:10505524
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=w75NrUUPZK" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=w75NrUUPZK</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105306" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105306</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Defining and Categorizing Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Older Population: A Systematic Review
Original language description
Objectives: Nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) constitute an important part of treatment for older adults, cover a broad and diverse range of interventions, and have advantages over pharmacologic interventions (eg, limited adverse side effects). However, an unambiguous definition of NPIs is still lacking. Defining NPIs may facilitate research on this topic and enhance comparability of results between studies, and might help to face the challenges of recognition, acceptation, funding, and implementation. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an overview and comparison of the definitions of NPIs used in the current literature on older adults. Design: A systematic review was performed to provide an overview of the definitions of NPIs that are used in the current literature on older populations and to organize the characteristics involved in the definitions. Setting and Participants: People >= 60 years of age were included, not limited to a specific setting. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the following 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Wiley/Cochrane Library. The time frame within the databases was from inception to December 4, 2023. Review articles, editorials and consensus papers were included. Results: We included 28 articles. We organized the definitions of NPI according to 4 different aspects: types of interventions involved, target population, goals the interventions addressed, and requirements of the interventions. Definitions in the current literature can generally be divided into 2 groups: NPIs described as not involving medication, and more elaborated multidomain definitions. Based on the results, we formulated criteria for types of interventions that can be considered an NPI. Conclusions and Implications: Using current descriptions and characteristics, elements for a new definition for NPIs were proposed. To improve research in this field, consensus needs to be reached regarding elements covered by a definition of NPIs.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
ISSN
1525-8610
e-ISSN
1538-9375
Volume of the periodical
26
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
105306
UT code for WoS article
001354476900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85208095037