All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F07%3A00003091" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/07:00003091 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.008</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.008</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment

  • Original language description

    An important step in finite element modeling is the process of validation to derive clinical relevant data. It can be assumed that defect states of a finite element model, which have not been validated before, may predict wrong results. The purpose of this study was to show the differences in accuracy between a calibrated and a non-calibrated finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment for different clinical defects. For this study, two geometrically identical finite element models were used. An invitro experiment was designed, deriving data for the calibration. Frequently used material properties were obtained from the literature and transferred into the non-calibrated model. Both models were validated on three clinical defects: bilateral hemifacetectomy, nucleotomy and interspinous defects, whereas in vitro range of motion data served as control points. Predictability and accuracy of the calibrated and non-calibrated finite element model were evaluated and compared. Both finite

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    JB - Sensors, detecting elements, measurement and regulation

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2007

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Clinical Biomechanics

  • ISSN

    0268-0033

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    22

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    377-384

  • UT code for WoS article

    000246127800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database