Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F10%3A00002482" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/10:00002482 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064173:_____/10:00002482
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?
Original language description
Two groups of patients were treated for pertrochanteric fractures (AO/ASIF 31A1+A2) with an intramedullary hip nail. In the first group of 44 patients distal dynamic locking was used, and in the second group of 74 patients the nail was not distally locked. Comparison of the two groups of patients did not show any difference in terms of the period of fracture healing, radiological and functional results or frequency of complications. In the group with a distally locked nail the surgery took 40.4 minutes,while in the group without distal locking only 34.4 minutes. In total, we recorded only seven complications, none of which were caused by absence of distal locking of the nail. This study has shown that distal locking of IMHN is unnecessary in most pertrochanteric fractures (AO/ASIF 31A1+2). The only exceptions are comminution of the lateral wall of the greater trochanter, secondary diaphyseal fracture line, large posteromedial fragment extended distally below the level of the lesser tr
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FI - Traumatology and orthopaedics
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2010
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)