Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F11%3A00003282" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/11:00003282 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Original language description
Major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is associated with an increased risk of subsequent mortality and recurrent ischemic events. Observational data and small randomized trials suggest that radial instead of femoral access for coronary angiography/intervention results in fewer bleeding complications, with preserved and possibly improved efficacy. Radial access versus femoral access has yet to be formally evaluated in a randomized trial adequately powered for the comparison of clinically important outcomes
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)