All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F13%3A43907361" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/13:43907361 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

  • Original language description

    Objectives The authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access. Background Small trials have shown an increase in the radiation dose with radial compared with femoral access, but many were performed during the operators' learning curve of radial access. Methods Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, as a part of the RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL) trial (N = 7,021). Fluoroscopy time was prospectively collected in 5740 patients and radiation dose quantified as airkerma in 1,445 patients and dose-area product (DAP) in 2,255 patients. Results Median fluoroscopy time was higher with radial versus femoral access (9.3 vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Median air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access (1,046 vs. 930 mGy, respectively, p = 0.051). Median DAP was not different between radial and femoral access (52.8 Gy-cm(2) vs. 51.2 Gy.cm(2), p = 0.83). When results are stratified according to procedural volume, air kerma was increased onl

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions

  • ISSN

    1936-8798

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    6

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    258-266

  • UT code for WoS article

    000317485300011

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database