All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

International Comparisons of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Rates in High- Income Countries: Should Exclusion Thresholds Be Based on Birth Weight or Gestational Age?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F13%3A43907961" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/13:43907961 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00023698:_____/13:#0000147

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    International Comparisons of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Rates in High- Income Countries: Should Exclusion Thresholds Be Based on Birth Weight or Gestational Age?

  • Original language description

    We compared the effects of using a 1000-gram birth weight or a 28-week gestational age threshold on reported rates of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregated data from 2004 on births and deaths tabulated by birth weight and gestational age from 29 European countries/regions participating in the Euro-Peristat project were used to compute fetal and neonatal mortality rates using cut-offs of 1000-grams and 28-weeks (2.8 million total births). We measured differences in rates between andwithin countries using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Principal Findings: For fetal mortality, rates based on gestational age were significantly higher than those based on birth weight (p, 0.001), although these differences varied between countries. The use of a 1000-gram threshold included 8823 fetal deaths compared with 9535 using a 28-week threshold (difference of 712). In contrast, the choice of a cut-off made little difference for comparis

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FK - Gynaecology and obstetrics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    PLoS One

  • ISSN

    1932-6203

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    8

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    "e64869; 1"-7

  • UT code for WoS article

    000319966400066

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database