Variations of the celiac trunk investigated by multidetector computed tomography: Systematic review and meta-analysis with clinical correlations

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F20%3A43919684" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/20:43919684 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11130/20:10405861 RIV/00064173:_____/20:N0000003 RIV/00064203:_____/20:10405861

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23576" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23576</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23576" target="_blank" >10.1002/ca.23576</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Variations of the celiac trunk investigated by multidetector computed tomography: Systematic review and meta-analysis with clinical correlations

Original language description

INTRODUCTION: In recent years multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has been used to investigate vascular anatomy for scientific and diagnostic purposes. These studies allow for much larger sample sizes than traditional cadaveric studies. The aim of this research was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies investigating the variations of the celiac trunk using MDCT. METHODS: Major medical databases were used to find studies investigating celiac trunk anatomy using MDCT. Extracted information included demographic details, number of normal celiac trunks and number of each variant celiac trunk. Using a random effects meta-analysis the pooled prevalence of each variation was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies from fourteen countries and four continents were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of subjects included was 17,391. The total prevalence of variant celiac trunks was 10.85%. The different types of celiac trunk variations with their prevalences were: gastrosplenic trunk (3.46%), hepatosplenic trunk (3.88%), hepatogastric trunk (0.24%), absent celiac trunk (0.28%), celiacomesenteric trunk (0.46%), hepatosplenomesenteric trunk (0.26%), gastrosplenomesenteric trunk (0.07%), and celiacomesenteric anastomosis (0.09%). A total of 61 cases (0.19%) were either not described or not described adequately to be included in our classification. CONCLUSION: Major variations of the celiac trunk are not uncommon and should be anticipated before radiological and surgical interventions. Knowledge of celiac trunk anatomy is important in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, transplantology and interventional radiology.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30106 - Anatomy and morphology (plant science to be 1.6)

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2020

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Clinical Anatomy

ISSN

0897-3806

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

33

Issue of the periodical within the volume

8

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

13

Pages from-to

1249-1261

UT code for WoS article

000513906700001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85079725829