The use of sentinel skin islands for monitoring buried and semi-buried micro-vascular flaps. Part I: Summary and brief description of monitoring methods
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F21%3A43921377" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921377 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/21:10426508 RIV/00064211:_____/21:W0000016 RIV/00064165:_____/21:10426508 RIV/00064173:_____/21:N0000032
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2021.016" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2021.016</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2021.016" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2021.016</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The use of sentinel skin islands for monitoring buried and semi-buried micro-vascular flaps. Part I: Summary and brief description of monitoring methods
Original language description
Micro-vascular flaps have been used for the repair of challenging defects for over 45 years. The risk of failure is reported to be around 5-10% which despite medical and technical advances in recent years remains essentially unchanged. Precise, continuous, sensitive and specific monitoring together with prompt notification of vascular compromise is crucial for the success of the procedure. In this review, we provide a classification and brief description of the reported methods for monitoring the micro-vascular flap and a summary of the benefits over direct visual monitoring. Over 40 different monitoring techniques have been reported but their comparative merits are not always obvious. One looks for early detection of a flap's compromise, improved flap salvage rate and a minimal false-positive or false-negative rate. The cost-effectiveness of any method should also be considered. Direct visualisation of the flap is the method most generally used and still seems to be the simplest, cheapest and most reliable method for flap monitoring. Considering the alternatives, only implantable Doppler ultrasound probes, near infrared spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry have shown any evidence of improved flap salvage rates over direct visual monitoring.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Biomedical Papers
ISSN
1213-8118
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
165
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
113-130
UT code for WoS article
000660244900002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85108847356