Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F25%3A43927697" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/25:43927697 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011" target="_blank" >10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives
Original language description
The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
ISSN
0898-4921
e-ISSN
1537-1921
Volume of the periodical
37
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
255-264
UT code for WoS article
001504930000001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85209228279