What can neurofeedback and transcranial alternating current stimulation reveal about cross-frequency coupling?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F25%3A43928114" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/25:43928114 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773" target="_blank" >10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What can neurofeedback and transcranial alternating current stimulation reveal about cross-frequency coupling?
Original language description
In recent years, the dynamics and function of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) in electroencephalography (EEG) have emerged as a prevalent area of investigation within the research community. One possible approach in studying CFC is to utilize non-invasive neuromodulation methods such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB). In this study, we address (1) the potential applicability of single and multifrequency tACS and NFB protocols in CFC research; (2) the prevalence of CFC types, such as phase-amplitude or amplitude-amplitude CFC, in tACS and NFB studies; and (3) factors that contribute to inter- and intraindividual variability in CFC and ways to address them potentially. Here we analyzed research studies on CFC, tACS, and neurofeedback. Based on current knowledge, CFC types have been reported in tACS and NFB studies. We hypothesize that direct and indirect effects of tACS and neurofeedback can induce CFC. Several variability factors such as health status, age, fatigue, personality traits, and eyes-closed (EC) vs. eyes-open (EO)condition may influence the CFC types. Modifying the duration of the tACS and neurofeedback intervention and selecting a specific demographic experimental group could reduce these sources of CFC variability. Neurofeedback and tACS appear to be promising tools for studying CFC.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Frontiers in Neuroscience
ISSN
1662-453X
e-ISSN
1662-453X
Volume of the periodical
19
Issue of the periodical within the volume
February
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
1465773
UT code for WoS article
001431319800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85219561861