All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Commentary: Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F18%3A10376741" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/18:10376741 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21460/18:00329628 RIV/68407700:21730/18:00329628 RIV/00064203:_____/18:10376741

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00389" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00389</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00389" target="_blank" >10.3389/fendo.2018.00389</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Commentary: Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial

  • Original language description

    The articles published by Young et al.have presented the results and protocol of their Monitor Trial Study, comparing three approaches to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to the subsequent outcome of their HbA1c metabolic control, by investigating 3 groups of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients treated with non-insulin antidiabetics, i.e., &quot;no SMBG,&quot; &quot;once daily SMBG,&quot; and &quot;once daily SMBG with enhanced patient feedback&quot; groups. The authors concluded that neither clinically nor statistically significant differences were found after year 1 of the study, thus expressing a skeptical view toward the routine use of SMBG in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. A comprehensive list of metanalysis, studies, and recommendations presenting inconsistent results and advice as to the use of SMBG in treating T2DM patients were mentioned in the article The Authors also considered the fact that there was only lower grade evidence (B, C, D) supporting SMBG treatment, including our paper recommending specified SMBG use. The Monitor Trial Study team has collected and analyzed a large amount of data, leading to interesting and profound debate. Nevertheless, we would like to make three comments that may contribute to further, more detailed discussion of the issue.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30202 - Endocrinology and metabolism (including diabetes, hormones)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů