European first responder systems and differences in return of spontaneous circulation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A study of registry cohorts
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F21%3A10419701" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/21:10419701 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00179906:_____/21:10419701
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=X_KhfFfFi_" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=X_KhfFfFi_</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100004</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
European first responder systems and differences in return of spontaneous circulation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A study of registry cohorts
Original language description
Background: In Europe, survival-rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary widely between regions. Whether a system dispatching First Responders (FRs; main FR-types: firefighters, police officers, citizen-responders) is present or not may be associated with survival-rates. This study aimed to assess the association between having a dispatched FR-system and rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival across Europe. Methods: Results of an inventory of dispatched FR-systems for OHCA in Europe were combined with aggregate ROSC and survival data from the EuReCa-TWO study and additionally collected data. Regression analysis (weighted on number of patients included per region) was performed to study the association between having a dispatched FR-system and ROSC and survival-rates to hospital discharge in the total population and in patients with shockable initial rhythm, witnessed OHCA and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; Utstein comparator group). For regions without a dispatched FR-system, the theoretical survival-rate if a dispatched FR-system would have existed was estimated. Findings: We included 27 European regions. There were 15,859 OHCAs in the total group and 2,326 OHCAs in the Utstein comparator group. Aggregate ROSC and survival-rates were significantly higher in regions with an FR-system compared to regions without (ROSC: 36% [95%CI 35%-37%] vs. 24% [95%CI 23%-25%]; P<0.001; survival in total population [N=15.859]: 13% [95%CI 12%-15%] vs. 5% [95%CI 4%-6%]; P<0.001; survival in Utstein comparator group [N=2326]: 33% [95%CI 30%-36%] vs. 18% [95%CI 16%-20%]; P<0.001), and in regions with more than one FR-type compared to regions with only one FR-type. All main FR-types were associated with higher survival-rates (all P<0.050). Interpretation: European regions with dispatched FRs showed higher ROSC and survival-rates than regions without.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30223 - Anaesthesiology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Lancet Regional Health. Europe [online]
ISSN
2666-7762
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
1
Issue of the periodical within the volume
February
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
100004
UT code for WoS article
000654676300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85111351291