All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Can We Hear Silence?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10409789" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10409789 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=e4-K-FvIn9" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=e4-K-FvIn9</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00076-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11406-019-00076-6</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Can We Hear Silence?

  • Original language description

    We can hear silence because silence, an absence of sound, causes our hearing of it. Advocating this position, Roy Sorensen puts to use his own theory of the direct perception of absences. Sorensen&apos;s theory, which relies on two theories of perception (the causal theory of perception and the theory of non-epistemic perception), certainly has its appeal. However, it also has its problematic aspects. On my reading, a weak point of his theory is that it does not provide a criterion for the identification of what exactly we hear. By elaborating this objection in detail, I intend to demonstrate that Sorensen&apos;s theory (i) does not concern direct (non-epistemic) perception, and (ii) does not show that silence is causally efficient. Therefore, (iii) it fails to show that silence is the genuine negative object of hearing. I conclude by giving two further reasons for why the ontology that underpins Sorensen&apos;s theory should not be endorsed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA17-05919S" target="_blank" >GA17-05919S: Between Perception and Propositional Knowledge</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Philosophia

  • ISSN

    0048-3893

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    Neuveden

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    48

  • Country of publishing house

    IL - THE STATE OF ISRAEL

  • Number of pages

    21

  • Pages from-to

    33-53

  • UT code for WoS article

    000519447200002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85064642570