All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10422616" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10422616 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21620/20:00342429

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=r0.e1Vg7mY" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=r0.e1Vg7mY</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0037" target="_blank" >10.2478/jdis-2020-0037</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

  • Original language description

    Purpose: We study the proportion of Web of Science (WoS) citation links that are represented in the Crossref Open Citation Index (COCI), with the possible aim of using COCI in research evaluation instead of the WoS, if the level of coverage was sufficient. Design/methodology/approach: We calculate the proportion on citation links where both publications have a WoS accession number and a DOI simultaneously, and where the cited publications have had at least one author from our institution, the Czech Technical University in Prague. We attempt to look up each such citation link in COCI. Findings: We find that 53.7% of WoS citation links are present in the COCI. The proportion varies largely by discipline. The total figures differ significantly from 40% in the large-scale study by Van Eck, Waltman, Lariviere, and Sugimoto (blog 2018, https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234). Research limitations: The sample does not cover all science areas uniformly; it is heavily focused on Engineering and Technology, and only some disciplines of Natural Sciences are present. However, this reflects the real scientific orientation and publication profile of our institution. Originality/value: The present study illustrates a COCI vs WoS comparison on the scale of a larger technical university in Central Europe.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50803 - Information science (social aspects)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Data and Information Science

  • ISSN

    2096-157X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    5

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    35-42

  • UT code for WoS article

    000595040100004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85091822963