All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The multiple group IRT measurement invariance analysis of the Self-Compassion Scale in ten international samples

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F21%3A10427208" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/21:10427208 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=JyxNrzXPSn" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=JyxNrzXPSn</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2682" target="_blank" >10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2682</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The multiple group IRT measurement invariance analysis of the Self-Compassion Scale in ten international samples

  • Original language description

    The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Self-Compassion Scale by IRT differential test functioning in ten distinct populations (n = 13623 participants) from ten different countries: Australia (n = 517), China (n = 321), Czech Republic (n = 5081), Germany (n = 2510), Italy (n = 384), Portugal (n = 512), Slovakia (n = 1181), South Korea (n = 1813), Turkey (n =471), and USA (n = 833). We assessed differential test functioning for the two SCS subscales, Self- compassionate responding and Self-uncompassionate responding separately, because previous bifactor and two-tier analyses of the scale showed the best fit with two separate general factors, and not for the overall score. Only 13 of the 45 comparisons for Self-compassionate responding and 13 of the 45 comparisons for Self-uncompassionate responding (analyses of every pair) demonstrated measurement invariance (no differential test functioning). Generally, our results revealed that the two subscales of Self-compassionate responding and Self-uncompassionate responding were not equivalent among all countries and groups. Therefore, it is impossible to compare overall scores across all countries. Two subscales of the Self-Compassion Scale (Self-compassionate responding and Self- uncompassionate responding) are valid and reliable instruments with substantial potential of use cross- culturally, but results reveal significant cross-cultural differences in the way these two constructs are measured by the subscales of the SCS. Future analyses of the meanings and connotations of this construct across the world are necessary to develop a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-compassion.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30300 - Health sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology [online]

  • ISSN

    2282-1619

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    IT - ITALY

  • Number of pages

    27

  • Pages from-to

    1-27

  • UT code for WoS article

    000646049600004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85105781319