All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Pseudo-Coordination of a verb jít/go in contemporary Czech

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F22%3A10407929" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/22:10407929 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/la.274.08sko" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1075/la.274.08sko</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.274.08sko" target="_blank" >10.1075/la.274.08sko</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Pseudo-Coordination of a verb jít/go in contemporary Czech

  • Original language description

    This chapter investigates the use of the verb jít (&apos;go&apos;) in two construction typesin the Czech language; they have in common a binary coordinative structure where the verb jít is coordinated with any other verb with the coordinator a (&apos;and&apos;). These constructions are prototypical coordination (ProCo)and pseudo-coordination (PseCo). The main claim is that even though thesetwo types share the same surface structure jít-a-V2, they represent distinctphenomena.The resolution criteria are based on a two-part analysis. First, PseCo is analysed as a complex predicate. This analysis immediately accounts for a numberof properties of PseCo compared to ProCo. Second, the formal features of theconstruction are linked to its semantic structure: PseCo expresses aktionsart viacoordination over sub-stages of events.I argue that ProCo is a biclausal structure coordinating two separate events,while PseCo coordinates two verbs into one complex predicate and the coordinator a (&apos;and&apos;) serves for a coordination of sub-stages of this combined event.It appears that the first verb expresses the preparatory phase for the activitydenoted by the second verb. The pseudo-coordinative verb in the first conjunctlexicalises a manner component in the internal event structure. The verb &apos;go&apos; isdesemanticized and instead of the meaning of physical motion expresses dynamic aspects of the second event.This research is based on 1611 examples from the Czech National Corpus,subcorpus SYN2005, from which 923 examples are analysed as ProCo and 668 asPseCo.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000734" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000734: Creativity and Adaptability as Conditions of the Success of Europe in an Interrelated World</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions

  • ISBN

    978-90-272-1088-3

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    192-211

  • Number of pages of the book

    342

  • Publisher name

    Benjamins Publishers

  • Place of publication

    Amsterdam

  • UT code for WoS chapter