Image of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian Media
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F22%3A10455454" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/22:10455454 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii
Original language description
The study attempts to trace the main discourse of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian media after the beginning of the so-called Crimean crisis and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in March 2014. The discourse is based on mapping a few popular news websites on both sides of the Ukraini- an-Russian border: Pravda.com.ua, 24.tv.ua, Segodnya.ua, Interfax.ru, Ria.ru and Lenta.ru. In the study several particular cases and their interpretations are exam- ined: the so-called referendum and the annexation of Crimea; the ethnic minority of the Crimean Tatars; the tourist movement in Crimea; the Crimean bridge; the economic sanctions introduced because of the annexation of Crimea. In each of these cases opposite discourses are evident: the Russian media discourse is based on the official interpretation of Crimea as a historical and cultural part of "Russia's world", with an emphasis put on the strategical importance of the peninsula. The Ukrainian approach is mainly based on the illegality of the annexation and an em- phasis is laid on the juridical aspect of every topic in the Crimean context. These discourses are rather stable throughout the period of 2014-2019.
Czech name
Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii
Czech description
The study attempts to trace the main discourse of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian media after the beginning of the so-called Crimean crisis and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in March 2014. The discourse is based on mapping a few popular news websites on both sides of the Ukraini- an-Russian border: Pravda.com.ua, 24.tv.ua, Segodnya.ua, Interfax.ru, Ria.ru and Lenta.ru. In the study several particular cases and their interpretations are exam- ined: the so-called referendum and the annexation of Crimea; the ethnic minority of the Crimean Tatars; the tourist movement in Crimea; the Crimean bridge; the economic sanctions introduced because of the annexation of Crimea. In each of these cases opposite discourses are evident: the Russian media discourse is based on the official interpretation of Crimea as a historical and cultural part of "Russia's world", with an emphasis put on the strategical importance of the peninsula. The Ukrainian approach is mainly based on the illegality of the annexation and an em- phasis is laid on the juridical aspect of every topic in the Crimean context. These discourses are rather stable throughout the period of 2014-2019.
Classification
Type
C - Chapter in a specialist book
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Book/collection name
Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii
ISBN
978-80-86420-85-1
Number of pages of the result
15
Pages from-to
335-349
Number of pages of the book
384
Publisher name
Slovanský ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
Place of publication
Praha
UT code for WoS chapter
—