All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Judicial interpretation as a competence

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10439757" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10439757 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Judicial interpretation as a competence

  • Original language description

    The objective of this paper is to explain why interpretation of the law cannot be understood as mere intellectual cognition of the meaning of the text being interpreted. Indeed, interpretation of a legal text yields a duty enforceable by the law. This paper therefore first deals with the question of what interpretation of the law has in common with interpretation in general and in what ways it differs. A specific aspect of interpreting the law lies especially in the purpose of interpretation, i.e. setting a specific duty for an individual entity. Interpretation of the law can thus be conceived as a process aimed to ensure that what is laid down in general terms is in conformity with what is eventually applied specifically in an individual case. Interpretation, as transformation of a general and (usually also) abstractly formulated duty into an individualised specific duty, thus includes two distinct competences: (i) the competence to specify (concretise) a legal norm; and (ii) the competence to individualise a legal norm. However, interpretation is usually only equated to &quot;concretisation&quot; of decisions, which relates to the abstract nature of the general norm under which the given situation is subsumed. This chapter shows, nonetheless, that the law is already being interpreted in the process of choosing the correct norm from among possible alternatives. Teleological considerations are thus already made at the stage of individualisation with a view to determining which norm will be the most appropriate for assessing the given legal case.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-10723S" target="_blank" >GA19-10723S: What unifies current law and what fragmentises it from the perspective of legal theory and judicial practice?</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Judicial Law-Making and Judicial Interpretation in Central European Countries: How Can Courts Stengten or Weaken the Unity of Law?

  • ISBN

    978-80-7676-183-4

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    79-94

  • Publisher name

    Wolters Kluwer

  • Place of publication

    Prague, Warsaw, Bratislava, Budapest

  • Event location

    Luzern

  • Event date

    Jul 7, 2019

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article