Freedom of Speech in Liberal and Non-liberal Traditions
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F22%3A10454337" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/22:10454337 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DD-jathce7" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DD-jathce7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01914537221095285" target="_blank" >10.1177/01914537221095285</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Freedom of Speech in Liberal and Non-liberal Traditions
Original language description
The article presents different theories and comparative analyses of freedom of speech in both liberal and non-liberal traditions. Whereas freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the question is if this right should depend wholly on the truth of the respective opinion or statement. Theories that justify free speech on the grounds of autonomy, tend to make truth a moral requirement of speech. Theories based on civility and public reason do restrict freedom of speech even further, often making a form of recognition a precondition of free speech. This reveals to be particularly relevant in multicultural contexts and discussions about blasphemy. From this overview of contemporary, global comparative debates on free speech, the article draws some conclusions. First, there should be the absolute primacy of free speech regarding governments and the powerful: Speak truth to power. Second, free speech should underlie no constraints where important individual rights are at stake. Third, academic freedom has a special status and should not be subject to the same limits as freedom of expression more generally. Forth, in civil society and the public sphere a more moderate approach to free speech should be adopted based on civility, public reason and recognition. Yet, any limits should be of moral and not legal nature.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LL2106" target="_blank" >LL2106: Identity Constitutionalism. The Community-building Capacity of Constitutions in the EU-MENAP Region</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Philosophy & Social Criticism [online]
ISSN
1461-734X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
48
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
460-472
UT code for WoS article
000783505400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85128295419