Abuse of Dominance and the DMA - Differing Objectives or Prevailing Continuity?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10464934" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10464934 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Q6LVTPRgRG" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Q6LVTPRgRG</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.13" target="_blank" >10.14712/23366478.2023.13</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Abuse of Dominance and the DMA - Differing Objectives or Prevailing Continuity?
Original language description
A new EU regulation called the Digital Markets Act aims to keep digital markets open andfair in the face of the power of the so-called internet gatekeepers. Although the DMA has, atthe first sight, much in common with Article 102 TFEU, which prohibits abuse of dominantpositions, it declares itself to be a different instrument pursuing different objectives and protecting different legal interests. This text seeks to identify the similarities and differences inthe values and objectives pursued between Article 102 TFEU and the DMA. Both are toolsin the toolbox of the European Commission's DG Competition and their complementarityis desirable in theory and practice if competition-incompatible regulation of selected onlineplatforms is not to occur, possibly leading to their unwanted double punishment for the samething. The analysis carried out leads to the conclusion that, despite the insistence on theirseparate nature and on differences in their objectives, a value consensus prevails between thetwo instruments.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
ISSN
0323-0619
e-ISSN
2336-6478
Volume of the periodical
69
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
33-51
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85165248964