All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Conviction following an appeal against an aquittal in criminal process - wider context, advantages, risks and limits

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10475348" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10475348 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=T3m16RX9xT" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=T3m16RX9xT</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Conviction following an appeal against an aquittal in criminal process - wider context, advantages, risks and limits

  • Original language description

    This study1 deals with exceptions of the right to appeal in criminal matters. This right is enshrined in Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The aim of this study is primarily to draw attention to the exceptions to the right of appeal in criminal matters, based on the available literature and not very rich case law of the ECtHR, to confront them with Czech law. The core of the paper presented is an analysis of Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. There are three exceptions oncerning the right of appeal in criminal matters, which are regulated in Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. Firstly, the exceptions apply to offences of a minor character, secondly, the situation where the first instance decision was made by the highest court authority, and finally, the conviction on the basis of an appeal against a judgement of acquittal. The study concludes that the provision of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR is an important provision, but it is not a firm guarantee, as an essential part of the regulation is left up to national law (§ 1) and there are specified several exceptions as well (§ 2). Czech law is taken into account in this study.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

  • ISSN

    1805-0565

  • e-ISSN

    1805-0999

  • Volume of the periodical

    2023

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    14

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    243-260

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85185694371