All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Principle of Complementarity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10497753" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10497753 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84216-0_4" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84216-0_4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84216-0_4" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-84216-0_4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Principle of Complementarity

  • Original language description

    This chapter analyses existing practice concerning the backbone of the Rome Statute, part of an admissibility test to be assessed once the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is established: the principle of complementarity. Its basic premise is that states are primarily responsible for the investigation and prosecution of crimes under international law, including war crimes. Thus, in ideal situation, should states carry their obligations perfectly, the principle would render the ICC superfluous. In a real world, however, the principle counts with states being &quot;unwilling or unable&quot; genuinely to carry out these obligations, and under those conditions, the ICC steps in. As such, the principle is a tool to solve vertical conflict of jurisdictions (domestic and international). As the ICC has exercised its jurisdiction for more than 22 years, it has already had an opportunity to elaborate upon the principle, yet certain unclarity remains. This chapter critically points out some problematic interpretations and deals with both theoretical, yet not addressed topics, as well as those already addressed by the ICC case law.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Prosecution of War Crimes before the ICC. Achievements and Challenges

  • ISBN

    978-3-031-84215-3

  • Number of pages of the result

    28

  • Pages from-to

    47-74

  • Number of pages of the book

    212

  • Publisher name

    Palgrave Macmillan Cham

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • UT code for WoS chapter