All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Civil Liability for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Is There a Need For a New Paradigm?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10505966" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10505966 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=0BrfDS0LBg" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=0BrfDS0LBg</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Civil Liability for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Is There a Need For a New Paradigm?

  • Original language description

    The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical practice raises pressing questions for civil liability law. While AI systems promise enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, their autonomous and opaque black box nature poses unique legal challenges. This paper investigates whether existing tort law frameworks, particularly within the Czech legal system, are sufficient to address harms caused by medical AI. It systematically analyses three core liability regimes: breach of the standard of care, strict liability based on a defect of a thing or product, and liability for damage caused by a thing in and of itself. The authors argue that, although each presents interpretive and evidentiary difficulties in the context of AI, none is fundamentally unfit for addressing AI-related harms. Instead of advocating for a wholly new legal regime or the creation of a fictive electronic person, the paper supports a cautious evolution of existing doctrines, refined through case law, medical guidelines, and professional standards. Special attention is given to the distinction between certified medical AI devices and general-purpose systems like large language models. The authors also explore the implications of EU legislation, notably the AI Act. The paper concludes that legal conservatism, rooted in pragmatism, may serve the justice system best as the practical use of AI in medicine continues to unfold.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The Lawyer Quarterly

  • ISSN

    1805-8396

  • e-ISSN

    1805-840X

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    21

  • Pages from-to

    464-484

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105025914996