All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Automation of administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic: Critical reflections on the draft "ADM amendment" to the administrative procedure code

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10506899" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10506899 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=3nVXBAI.Uv" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=3nVXBAI.Uv</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33542/SIC2025-S-11" target="_blank" >10.33542/SIC2025-S-11</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Automation of administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic: Critical reflections on the draft "ADM amendment" to the administrative procedure code

  • Original language description

    This article examines the emerging regulation of automated administrative decision-making in the Czech Republic, with a focus on the recent proposal to introduce a new Section 15a into the Administrative Procedure Code. While the initiative reflects broader European efforts to digitalize public administration, it also exposes serious deficiencies in legislative technique, legal safeguards, and compliance with European law. The analysis situates the Czech debate against the background of existing domestic practices, such as algorithmic processing in tax administration and simplified enforcement mechanisms in traffic law, none of which presently authorize fully automated decisions. Using doctrinal analysis, critical regulatory assessment, and a targeted comparative perspective drawing on Sweden, Germany, and France, the article demonstrates that the Czech proposal fails to provide the necessary clarity, safeguards, and systemic preparation. It concludes that a responsible framework must be comprehensive, government-led, and accompanied by explicit criteria, robust safeguards, and institutional adaptation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia

  • ISSN

    1339-3995

  • e-ISSN

    1339-3995

  • Volume of the periodical

    13.2025

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    SPECIAL ISSUE

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    170-188

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105030123846