All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A threat to the right to a fair trial?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10514054" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10514054 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A threat to the right to a fair trial?

  • Original language description

    We live in an era of artificial intelligence development, in which there is no longer any debate about whether judges&apos; decisions will be replaced by artificial intelligence, but rather only about when and to what extent. It is precisely at this time that there is a growing need to draw attention to the constitutional limits of implementing AI in decision-making processes.Artificial intelligence already has its place in decision-making processes. Countries are increasingly introducing AI algorithms for decision-making in the judiciary. The growing importance of AI is evidenced, for example, by the fact that a judge consulted artificial intelligence instead of his own judgment when assessing criminality. This, of course, brings advantages, particularly speed and efficiency, but also risks, including possible systemic errors and a lack of the human element. This paper will focus on the consequences of deploying algorithmic systems in court decision-making in the context of the right to a fair trial. I will address the question of whether and how AI interferes with the right to a fair trial. The aim of the paper is to assess the extent to which the use of AI tools in the judiciary is compatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Ústavní právo a technologie

  • ISBN

    978-80-7502-850-1

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    27-36

  • Publisher name

    Nakladatelství Leges, s.r.o.

  • Place of publication

    Praha

  • Event location

    Jindřichův Hradec

  • Event date

    Jul 28, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    CST - Celostátní akce

  • UT code for WoS article