All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Allocating Decision-Making Powers Among Creditor Classes: The Ups and Downs of Battling Claims Heterogeneity in Czech Corporate Insolvency Law

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F13%3A10295837" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/13:10295837 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912001310" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912001310</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912001310" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1566752912001310</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Allocating Decision-Making Powers Among Creditor Classes: The Ups and Downs of Battling Claims Heterogeneity in Czech Corporate Insolvency Law

  • Original language description

    The problem of claims heterogeneity makes allocating decision-making powers an arduous task for any insolvency law that aims to vest control over corporate insolvency proceedings in the creditors. The Czech Insolvency Act 182/2006 is a case in point. Oneof the Act's chief reform aims was to take control over the proceedings away from the hands of the judges and insolvency trustees and vest it in the creditors. Five years after the Act entered into force, it is time to look at how it succeeded in its ambition. This article reviews the rules allocating decision-making powers between secured and unsecured creditors in relation to several key 'turning points' in Czech insolvency proceedings, and also looks at how the initial rules were interpreted and applied by the insolvency courts. It also points to a set of amendments adopted by the Czech Parliament in the autumn of 2013 with a view to codifying those interpretive approaches that were found to work, as well as reversing those where th

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GAP403%2F10%2F1235" target="_blank" >GAP403/10/1235: Institutional Responses to Financial Market Failures</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Business Organization Law Review

  • ISSN

    1566-7529

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    14

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    591-612

  • UT code for WoS article

    000331767600005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database