All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Selective reporting and the social cost of carbon

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10306813" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10306813 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61384399:31110/15:00046714

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988315002327" target="_blank" >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988315002327</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.009" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.009</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Selective reporting and the social cost of carbon

  • Original language description

    We examine potential selective reporting (publication bias) in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported than estimates excluding negative values of the SCC, which might create an upward bias in the literature. The evidence for selective reporting is stronger for studies published in peer-reviewedjournals than for unpublished papers. We show that the findings are not driven by the asymmetry of the confidence intervals surrounding the SCC and are robust to controlling for various characteristics of study design and to alternative definitions of confidence intervals. Our estimates of the mean reported SCC corrected for the selective reporting bias range between USD 0 and 134 per ton of carbon at 2010 prices for emission year 2015.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Energy Economics

  • ISSN

    0140-9883

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    51

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    September

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    394-406

  • UT code for WoS article

    000364439500035

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84940541889