Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10306860" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10306860 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61384399:31110/15:00046803
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003" target="_blank" >10.1515/nispa-2015-0003</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)
Original language description
Through the institute of public procurement is allocated a considerable volume of financial resources. It is therefore in the interest of contracting entities to seek ways of how to achieve an efficient allocation of resources. Some public contract awarding entities along with some public administration authorities in the Czech Republic believe that the use of a single evaluation criterion (the lowest bid price) results in a more efficient tender for a public contract. It was found that contracting entities in the Czech Republic strongly prefer to use the lowest bid price criterion. Within the examined sample, 86.5% of public procurements were evaluated this way. Analysis of the examined sample of public contracts proved that the choice of an evaluation criterion, even preference of the lowest bid price criterion, does not have any obvious impact on the final cost of a public contract. The study concludes that preferring the criterion of the lowest bid price within evaluation of public
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AE - Management, administration and clerical work
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
ISSN
1337-9038
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
8
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
41-59
UT code for WoS article
000360010800003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84938558688