All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10363687" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10363687 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century

  • Original language description

    This article explores understandings of the concept of empire in Georgian political intellectual discourses in the pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet Georgian contexts. Beginning with an elaboration of contemporary political and scholarly understanding of empire, the article then - drawing on the approaches of intellectual and transnational history - distils two meanings: empire of conquest and of civilisation. Both meanings are mainly attributed to the Russian State in its political incarnations as an empire, as the fulcrum of the Soviet Union and more recently as an entity in search of a Eurasian Union. The article argues that while for most of the nineteenth century, the concept of empire embodied by the Russia state was invested with both meanings, particularly by the end of the Soviet period, it came to be singularised to that of conquest. More generally, it suggests that while in contemporary international relations empire, as a political entity, remains discredited morally and legally, the Neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony in IR scholarship elucidates why and when some hegemonic states act as empires of conquest, and while some others can do both, thus mustering their &apos;structural power&apos; as well as &apos;soft power&apos;.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    INTERSECTIONS-EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND POLITICS

  • ISSN

    2416-089X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    HU - HUNGARY

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    104-123

  • UT code for WoS article

    000407648900007

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database