All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Making Regulatory Impact Assessment Gender-Sensitive: The Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F17%3A10360242" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/17:10360242 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.51E.6" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.51E.6</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.51E.6" target="_blank" >10.24193/tras.51E.6</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Making Regulatory Impact Assessment Gender-Sensitive: The Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia

  • Original language description

    Gender Impact Assessment (GIA) has been institutionalized in different ways in the Czech and Slovak Republics; the Czech Republic introduced GIA independently of regulatory impact assessment (RIA) process relatively early on, while Slovakia did so only during the modernizationof RIA processes in the early 2010s. Based on the analysis of 671 RIAs from 2007 to 2015 the study finds that with a few exceptions largely coming from the Ministries of Social Affairs where gender equality units were originally anchored in both countries, the GIA responses are relatively formal and &apos;blind&apos;. This is despite the obligations and RIA modernization processes in both countries which introduced also standardization and supervision of RIA processes by independent bodies. Both countries witness persistent invisibility of gender, despite different GIA trajectories which can be attributed to the dominance of economists in both RIA processes.

  • Czech name

    —

  • Czech description

    —

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

    —

  • OECD FORD branch

    50602 - Public administration

Result continuities

  • Project

    —

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

  • ISSN

    1842-2845

  • e-ISSN

    —

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    51E

  • Country of publishing house

    RO - ROMANIA

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

    89-105

  • UT code for WoS article

    000405969200006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85021708268