All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Parallel Reorganizations under the Recast European Insolvency Regulation - Selected EU Law Issues

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10382928" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10382928 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1314" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1314</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iir.1314" target="_blank" >10.1002/iir.1314</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Parallel Reorganizations under the Recast European Insolvency Regulation - Selected EU Law Issues

  • Original language description

    The Recast European Insolvency Regulation (EIR) (Regulation 2015/848) repealed the rules in Articles 3(3) and 27 of the original EIR (Regulation 1346/2000) that required that secondary insolvency proceedings take the form of a liquidation (winding-up). As a result, European debtors may now attempt to resolve their cross-border insolvencies via parallel reorganization proceedings conducted both in the Member State of the debtor&apos;s centre of main interest and in one or more Member States in which the debtor possesses an establishment. This article aims to take account of the principal rules of the Recast EIR which, in addition to the national laws of the Member States involved, will regulate such attempts. Upon the review of these selected rules, the article concludes that, in principle, the Recast EIR provides EU debtors with a feasible cross-border platform to reorganize in more than one Member State in parallel. However, the article finds that a particular rule central to the system of cross-border insolvency under the EIR, namely, Article 45, which allows the multiple filing of claims in all proceedings conducted in respect of the debtor, has the potential to frustrate attempts at parallel reorganizations. This is particularly so where the cross-filing rule combines with Member State law that is rigid as regards plan approval by creditor classes or minimum payouts to certain classes. Copyright (c) 2018 INSOL International and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50201 - Economic Theory

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Insolvency Review

  • ISSN

    1180-0518

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    27

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    34

  • Pages from-to

    340-373

  • UT code for WoS article

    000449777100004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85056609120