All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic (TDFR) as a "Georgian" responsibility

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10432890" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10432890 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic (TDFR) as a "Georgian" responsibility

  • Original language description

    This article looks at the historical perspectives and positions of key Georgian political !gures - mostly leading Social Democrats such as Noe Zhordania and Akaki Chkhenkeli, as well as National Democrats such as Niko Nikoladze - on the making and unmaking of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic (TDFR) by analyzing their re&quot;ections on the most heated political concepts of the !rst two decades of the twentieth century: nationality, nationalism, the nation-state, federation, economic development, and socialism in the Georgian, Transcaucasian and imperial contexts, given the rapidly shifting geopolitics of the region triggered by the onset of the Great War and aggravated by the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917. The article demonstrates that already having conceptualized the socio- economic and cultural needs of the nation as developing outside of the framework of the nation-state, Zhordania and Chkhenkeli viewed these instead within a regional federative context under a revolutionarily transformed imperial centre, while assuming that the Social Democrats would hold the commanding political position in Georgia. This prepared them to take responsibility for establishing de facto federative political institutions for Transcaucasia. That responsibility facilitated the making and unmaking of the short-lived, independent TDFR.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    The Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic of 1918: Federal Aspirations, Geopolitics and National Projects

  • ISBN

    978-0-367-74224-9

  • Number of pages of the result

    14

  • Pages from-to

    31-44

  • Number of pages of the book

    140

  • Publisher name

    Routledge

  • Place of publication

    Abingdon

  • UT code for WoS chapter