All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Who Owns The Ukrainian State? Tensions between the People and the Elites After 1991

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F22%3A10470750" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/22:10470750 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025" target="_blank" >10.13173/9783447117715.025</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Who Owns The Ukrainian State? Tensions between the People and the Elites After 1991

  • Original language description

    This research examines the post-1991 history of Ukraine through tensions between its people and the elites, which carves out space for an examination of the political agency of the people, subsequently re-imagined as populus, demos, and plebs. Acemoglu andRobinson&apos;s framework (2019) that defines a political regime through relations between a state and a society stands as a conceptual backbone of the present study. It is complemented with a political rendering of Albert O. Hirschman&apos;s approach (1970) to explicate the main strategies of political action Ukrainians lean upon. Several ideal-typical settings are distinguished and described: 1) &apos;Potemkin democracy&apos;, referring to patronal politics with disempowered people falling back on the &apos;exit&apos;strategy, interpreted as migration, curtailed reproduction, and disengagement from the political sphere; 2) &apos;radical democracy&apos;, in which people resort to mass protests in order to acquire a &apos;voice&apos;in strategic decision-making; 3) &apos;ocular democracy&apos;, in which people form the audience in a political theatre, defined through their &apos;loyalty&apos;to a leader as their political &apos;trustee&apos;, with social media presence and sociological polls acting as feedback loops.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Analyzing conflict settings. Case studies from Eastern Europe with a focus on Ukraine.

  • ISBN

    978-3-447-11771-5

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    25-44

  • Number of pages of the book

    333

  • Publisher name

    Harrassowitz Verlag

  • Place of publication

    Wiesbaden

  • UT code for WoS chapter