All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Navigating the role of emotions in expertise: public framing of expertise in the Czech public controversy on birth care

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F23%3A10450754" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/23:10450754 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=z4CgTigxOl" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=z4CgTigxOl</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09471-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11077-022-09471-5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Navigating the role of emotions in expertise: public framing of expertise in the Czech public controversy on birth care

  • Original language description

    Despite the abundant scholarship on sociopolitical embeddedness of expertise, its relation to emotions remains understudied. The paper fills this gap by discussing how public framings of expertise work against the inclusion of emotional contexts, affecting what kind of professional knowledge dominates in a public debate. The analysis of the Czech public debate on birth care shows that while midwives embrace emotional contexts of birthing and integrate them as an essential part of their professional expertise, obstetricians see these contexts as troubling their expertise. This professional difference is sustained by the public framing of expertise in the media, favoring obstetricians&apos; expertise over midwives&apos;. The analysis shows that public framing of expertise outweighs evidential work done by midwives and legal advisors and impacts how emotional contexts are understood in the debate. Rather than referring to feelings and personal experience of the body, the &quot;emotional&quot; becomes a discursive label to delegitimize professional opinion. The results raise thus important questions about how the public framing of expertise impacts whether emotional context and experiences of bodily harm are seen as relevant in policy debates and policy regulations.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50602 - Public administration

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-10042S" target="_blank" >GA18-10042S: Role of Intimacy in the Czech Home Birth Controversy</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Policy Sciences

  • ISSN

    0032-2687

  • e-ISSN

    1573-0891

  • Volume of the periodical

    56

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    549-571

  • UT code for WoS article

    000844924500002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85137983010