Navigating the role of emotions in expertise: public framing of expertise in the Czech public controversy on birth care
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F23%3A10450754" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/23:10450754 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=z4CgTigxOl" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=z4CgTigxOl</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09471-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11077-022-09471-5</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Navigating the role of emotions in expertise: public framing of expertise in the Czech public controversy on birth care
Original language description
Despite the abundant scholarship on sociopolitical embeddedness of expertise, its relation to emotions remains understudied. The paper fills this gap by discussing how public framings of expertise work against the inclusion of emotional contexts, affecting what kind of professional knowledge dominates in a public debate. The analysis of the Czech public debate on birth care shows that while midwives embrace emotional contexts of birthing and integrate them as an essential part of their professional expertise, obstetricians see these contexts as troubling their expertise. This professional difference is sustained by the public framing of expertise in the media, favoring obstetricians' expertise over midwives'. The analysis shows that public framing of expertise outweighs evidential work done by midwives and legal advisors and impacts how emotional contexts are understood in the debate. Rather than referring to feelings and personal experience of the body, the "emotional" becomes a discursive label to delegitimize professional opinion. The results raise thus important questions about how the public framing of expertise impacts whether emotional context and experiences of bodily harm are seen as relevant in policy debates and policy regulations.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50602 - Public administration
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA18-10042S" target="_blank" >GA18-10042S: Role of Intimacy in the Czech Home Birth Controversy</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Policy Sciences
ISSN
0032-2687
e-ISSN
1573-0891
Volume of the periodical
56
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
549-571
UT code for WoS article
000844924500002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85137983010