All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The “Commitment Trap” Revisited: Experimental Evidence on Ambiguous Nuclear Threats

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F24%3A10458562" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/24:10458562 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=701w87PTAv" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=701w87PTAv</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2023.8" target="_blank" >10.1017/XPS.2023.8</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The “Commitment Trap” Revisited: Experimental Evidence on Ambiguous Nuclear Threats

  • Original language description

    In this paper, we provide an empirical test for the theoretical claim that ambiguous nuclear threats create a &quot;commitment trap&quot; for American leaders: when deterrence fails, supposedly they are more likely to order the use of nuclear weapons to avoid domestic audience costs for backing down. We designed an original survey experiment and fielded it to a sample of 1,000 U.S. citizens. We found no evidence of a commitment trap when ambiguous nuclear threats are made. Unlike explicit threats, ambiguous ones did not generate domestic disapproval when the leader backed down; the decision to employ nuclear weapons led to more public backlash for the leader than being caught bluffing; and the threats did not influence public preference for nuclear use across our scenarios. Our findings contribute to the scholarly literature on nuclear crisis bargaining and policy debates over the future of US declaratory policy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Experimental Political Science

  • ISSN

    2052-2649

  • e-ISSN

    2052-2649

  • Volume of the periodical

    11

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    64-77

  • UT code for WoS article

    000946791300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85150347085