Elaborating the Philosophical Dimensions: The Development of Historical-Comparative Sociology in Johann Pall Arnason's Civilizational Analysis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F16%3A10333073" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/16:10333073 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214" target="_blank" >10.5840/si20162214</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Elaborating the Philosophical Dimensions: The Development of Historical-Comparative Sociology in Johann Pall Arnason's Civilizational Analysis
Original language description
This article deals with the work of the Icelandic sociologist and philosopher Johann Pall Arnason (*1940) and with his concept of 'civilizational analysis', which is nowadays understood as a subdiscipline of historical-comparative sociology. More precisely, I want to show that Arnason's original interpretation of civilizational analysis goes beyond the mainstream understanding of historical sociology as a dialogue between history and sociology in favour of philosophical approaches. By outlining the three levels of Arnason's civilizational analysis - (I.) the reconstruction of the concept of 'civilization', incl. its history, (II.) the link to philosophical sources and (III.) the theoretical development of Eisenstadt's heritage - the article shows that, according to Arnason, the concept of 'civilization' is understood as the field of convergence of the historical-sociological concepts of 'culture' (Max Weber, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt) on the one hand, and the philosophical concepts of the 'world' (Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jan Patočka, Cornelius Castoriadis) on the other. Arnason thus, defining 'culture' as the so-called 'interpretative articulation of the world', emphasizes the motif of 'cultural creativity', which is present, yet theoretically underdeveloped, both in Weber's and Eisenstadt's work. In this light, the article finally focuses on Arnason's most recent attempts to discuss Eisenstadt's concept of the 'civilizational dimension' of modernity. It deals primarily with the terms 'cultural ontology' and 'civilizational paradox', in which the need to link historical sociology to philosophical perspectives is most evident. The civilizational approach is thus introduced as the crucial framework of Arnason's elaboration of the philosophical dimensions in sociological analysis.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AO - Sociology, demography
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Social Imaginaries
ISSN
2393-2503
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2, Autumn 2016
Country of publishing house
RO - ROMANIA
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
105-120
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—