Metaphors, Signs, and Parasites: Nietzsche, Peirce, and Two Radical Interpretations of Aristotelian Protosemiotics

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F17%3A10363281" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/17:10363281 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem20167" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem20167</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem20167" target="_blank" >10.5840/cpsem20167</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Metaphors, Signs, and Parasites: Nietzsche, Peirce, and Two Radical Interpretations of Aristotelian Protosemiotics
Original language description
This article aims to compare some selected aspects of Peirce's semiotic with two other distinct but basic viewpoints on metaphor, which are inherently semiotic but not strictly in a Peircean way: Aristotle's analysis of metaphor as perhaps the most important figure of (persuasive and creative) speech in his Poetic and Rhetoric and Nietzsche's accent on the rhetorical/metaphorical and semiotic "non-essential nature" of language and his notion of strictly semiotic structure of thought (in his early Lectures on Rhetoric).
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)