Changes In Contemporary Attitudes In Critical Architecture And The Notion Of Lateness
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F22%3A10441028" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/22:10441028 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://smartart-conference.rs/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Zbornik-SmartArt2021.pdf" target="_blank" >https://smartart-conference.rs/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Zbornik-SmartArt2021.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Changes In Contemporary Attitudes In Critical Architecture And The Notion Of Lateness
Original language description
The aim of this paper is to present an inquiry into critical architecture by architect Peter Eisenman and various ways how to reach criticality in architecture; as well as a few examples presenting aspects of application of criticality in architecture. In particular the paper presents the last stage of the evolving investigation of criticality that was brought in the 2020 book called Lateness that offers crystallization of Eisenman's attitude toward the topic. Criticality and critical architecture are defined in accordance with theoretician K. Hays as such an architecture or attitude that does not serve blindly to mainstream power/dominant culture but on the other hand does not withdraw from the world to a purely formal structure disengaged from the contingencies of place and time. Critical architecture remains between these two extremities. As next the paper explains various ways into criticality. In long period it was a diagram that ensured criticality. But in the last period there emerged a new term and a new proposition. And this is lateness. Lateness, inspired from a study of late Beethoven's composition by Adorno, is a term used by Eisenman to designate (pieces of) architecture in which form or fragments of form are problematically related to their time determination. Form of a building consists of fragments (parts) that couldn't be determined in terms of style or period of time. What is important in this context is that criticality doesn't "dwell" in the form itself (that was the case in various previous stages). Criticality involve now relationship between form and time. Lateness is presented as a reaction to contemporary architecture.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Art and Science Applied: Experience and Vision
ISBN
978-86-80245-45-4
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
119-132
Publisher name
University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts
Place of publication
Bělehrad
Event location
Belgrade
Event date
Sep 23, 2021
Type of event by nationality
EUR - Evropská akce
UT code for WoS article
—