'Everything's the same, Everything's Halted': Quarantine in a 'Home' for People identified as Disabled
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F22%3A10450609" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/22:10450609 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11620/22:10450609
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y2GIuR4aOt" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y2GIuR4aOt</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/csr.2022.029" target="_blank" >10.13060/csr.2022.029</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
"Všechno stejný, všechno zastavený": Karanténa v "domově" pro lidi označené za postižené
Original language description
While many evaluations of the response from residential social ser- vices to the COVID-19 pandemic have pointed to high mortality rates and hu- man rights violations, some have given a positive assessment of their perfor- mance. Whatever the verdict, it is a fact that the clients of residential social ser- vices were subject to stricter and longer lockdown measures than the rest of the population. Our ethnographic research describes the lockdown technologies used at Home F, a residential institution for people identified as disabled. Set- ting out from the assumption that freedom is not the antithesis of some united regulatory regime but is the result of the intersection of various repertoires and logics of influence, the research analyses the 'passages' that regulate relations between the clients and their surroundings before and during the pandemic. It shows that the regulatory mechanisms that were put in place to facilitate an effective pandemic response do not constitute a new apparatus but only an intensification of technologies already in place. With the aim of mitigat- ing risk, they delegitimise the needs of clients, render relations dependent on obedience, and pass moralised judgements on behaviour. Such 'pedagogical arrangements' cause emotional suffering and do not leave much space for free- dom. In the discussion in the article we link our findings to the current debates about the productivity of power and (post)critical pedagogy, concluding that while pedagogy necessarily accompanies the management of risks, a critical gesture that delegitimises the interests and opinions of the objects of pedagogy may not be the most appropriate pedagogical method available.Keywords: residential institutions, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, risk management, building maintenance, pedagogical relations, post-critical pedagogy
Czech name
"Všechno stejný, všechno zastavený": Karanténa v "domově" pro lidi označené za postižené
Czech description
While many evaluations of the response from residential social ser- vices to the COVID-19 pandemic have pointed to high mortality rates and hu- man rights violations, some have given a positive assessment of their perfor- mance. Whatever the verdict, it is a fact that the clients of residential social ser- vices were subject to stricter and longer lockdown measures than the rest of the population. Our ethnographic research describes the lockdown technologies used at Home F, a residential institution for people identified as disabled. Set- ting out from the assumption that freedom is not the antithesis of some united regulatory regime but is the result of the intersection of various repertoires and logics of influence, the research analyses the 'passages' that regulate relations between the clients and their surroundings before and during the pandemic. It shows that the regulatory mechanisms that were put in place to facilitate an effective pandemic response do not constitute a new apparatus but only an intensification of technologies already in place. With the aim of mitigat- ing risk, they delegitimise the needs of clients, render relations dependent on obedience, and pass moralised judgements on behaviour. Such 'pedagogical arrangements' cause emotional suffering and do not leave much space for free- dom. In the discussion in the article we link our findings to the current debates about the productivity of power and (post)critical pedagogy, concluding that while pedagogy necessarily accompanies the management of risks, a critical gesture that delegitimises the interests and opinions of the objects of pedagogy may not be the most appropriate pedagogical method available.Keywords: residential institutions, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, risk management, building maintenance, pedagogical relations, post-critical pedagogy
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50401 - Sociology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA19-07724S" target="_blank" >GA19-07724S: Vulnerable residents in fragile residences: An inquiry into tensions of residential care</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review
ISSN
0038-0288
e-ISSN
2336-128X
Volume of the periodical
58
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
563-585
UT code for WoS article
000886365800004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85142274548